A heated row at the International Maritime Industries Forum has highlighted divisions within the shipping industry over what constitutes a proportionate response by armed guards when it comes to rules governing the use of force.
A presentation on maritime security delivered to the IMIF by Flagvictor chief executive Mark Hankey turned into a heated debate on use of force and the need to regulate private maritime security companies.
Mr Hankey showed the IMIF meeting a video of a group of US armed guards shooting at a pirate skiff.
The PMSC said that the guards were firing warning shots but there was no âonion layeredâ â or gradual â approach to protecting the ship and the guards continued to fire for some minutes as the vessel moved away from the pirates and the threat to the vessel became less urgent.
When Mr Hankey asked whether the audience thought the armed guardsâ response was in proportion to the threat, several said they supported the PMSCâs actions.
Salvage expert and former International Salvage Union general manager John Noble said: âLetâs stop pussyfooting around. If you are being attacked, you need to get in there and defend yourself. Where is the harm in that?â
Other members of the audience agreed, using the analogy that a PMSC needs to be âthe dog that barks louderâ.
When Mr Hankey questioned how this approach would sit with shipownersâ lawyers and insurers, one Greek shipper said: âThey can talk to me later.â
Holman Fenwick Wilan partner Elinor Dautlich said that while the standard contract has an additional advice document on rules on use of force, BIMCOâs Guardcon, which she helped to draft, did not apply internationally as every country had the right to decide its own individual rules.
She added that a âone size fits allâ approach was not possible.
Speaking after the presentation, Mr Hankey said: âThe audience certainly had strong views, which is to be expected on this emotive and important issue.â
IMIF chairman Jim Davies said the situation proved that rules on use of force must be clearly established, recognised by the court of human rights and defined internationally.
Speaking to Lloydâs List separately, BIMCO chief maritime security officer Giles Noakes said many shipowners had embraced Guardcon while others perhaps had not.
âThe reality of life is that the law and insurance surrounding PMSCs is difficult and it is absolutely essential to clarify this commercial risk now rather than waiting,â Mr Noakes warned.
He said that Guardconâs main aim was to distance the master from liability for the actions of the PMSC. Mr Noakes argued that Enrica Lexie was a classic example of a master not being charged for the actions of Italian marines.
âPeople have had a lot to say about Guardcon but I can tell you this, it has been used more rapidly than any other BIMCO contract to date,â he said.
The International Maritime Organization will debate PMSC regulation when its Maritime Security Committee meets in May.